After CNN Attacked Trump For Putin Comments, Trump Pulled Out a Piece of Paper That Exposes Them

The mainstream media has spent the past 24 hours in a hysterical panic about President Trump’s appearance with Vladimir Putin yesterday.

Liberal reporters and politicians tried to say that because Pres. Trump pointed out the FBI and Obama’s cover-up of Hillary’s potential crimes, that somehow meant he was denying Russian election interference.

Article Continues Below

In reality, he has admitted for months that Russian interference was real, it just wasn’t the REASON he won in 2016, as the media would have you believe. President Trump just came forward and pulled out a piece of paper that exposes media lies once and for all. WATCH then press the blue button at the bottom of this page to SHARE on Facebook!

Here was part of Pres. Trump’s statement:

“I have felt very strongly that while Russia’s actions had no impact at all on the outcome of the election, let me be totally clear in saying that — and I’ve said this many times — I accept our intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election took place. It could be other people also. There’s a lot of people out there. 

Advertisement

There was no collusion at all, and people have seen that and they’ve seen that strongly. The House has already come out very strongly on that. A lot of people have come out strongly on that. I thought that I made myself very clear by having just reviewed the transcript. Now, I have to say, I came back and I said, what is going on? What’s the big deal? 

So I got a transcript. I reviewed it. I actually went out and reviewed a clip of an answer that I gave and I realized that there is a need for some clarification. It should have been obvious, I thought it would be obvious but I would like to clarify just in case it wasn’t. In a key sentence in my remarks, I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t.’ 

The sentence should have been, ‘I don’t see any reason why I wouldn’t or why it wouldn’t be Russia.’

So, just to repeat it, I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t,’ and the sentence should have been and I thought I would be maybe a little bit unclear on the transcript or unclear on the actual video. The sentence should have been I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia. Sort of a double negative. 

As you know, President Obama was given information just prior to the election, last election, 2016, and they decided not to do anything about it. The reason they decided that was pretty obvious to all. They thought Hillary Clinton was going to win the election. And they didn’t think it was a big deal. When I won the election they thought it was a very big deal. And all of a sudden they went into action but it was a little bit late. So he was given that in sharp contrast to the way it should be. 

…..

President Obama along with [Former CIA director John] Brennan and [Former DNI James] Clapper and the whole group that you see on television now probably getting paid a lot of money by your networks, they knew about Russia’s attempt to interfere in the election in September and they totally buried it. As I said, they buried it because they thought that Hillary Clinton was going to win. Turned out it didn’t happen that way. By contrast, my administration has taken a very firm stance.”